Drugs

| | Comments (1)

Have you ever noticed that there are only ever three topics that people discuss during election years: education, healthcare, and taxes? This year we can add war to the mix, but on the whole these three topics dominate the discourse. In the realm of healthcare falls the recently-popular prescription drug cost debate. We all know that drugs are overpriced, in many cases outrageously so. The question Why? isn’t much addressed by the politicians, but the New Yorker’s Critic At Large, Malcom Gladwell, has taken a stab at the topic.

Gladwell takes the example of heartburn treatments Prilosec and Nexium to illustrate a very interesting point about the strategy of drug companies to boost profits and retain control of markets for one drug family or another. Prilosec was a brilliantly effective medication o treat heartburn and acid reflux, but it’s patent was running out. AstraZeneca, the maker of the drug, decided to change slightly in order to extend its patent.

The big drug companies justify the high prices they charge預nd the extraordinary profits they enjoy傭y arguing that the search for innovative, life-saving medicines is risky and expensive. But Nexium is little more than a repackaged version of an old medicine. And the hundred and twenty dollars a month that AstraZeneca charges isn稚 to recoup the costs of risky research and development; the costs were for a series of clinical trials that told us nothing we needed to know, and a half-billion-dollar marketing campaign selling the solution to a problem we壇 already solved.

Basically, the drug companies are turning out old drugs in new clothes, thus saving themselves huge expense and reaping massive profits. I’m all for making a profit. The problem is that we aren’t really getting more bang for our buck when this kind of thing goes on. Not only that, but we get less pharmaceutical innovation because there is no incentive to explore as many new drugs when the old ones can simply be repackaged and re-marketed at least twice, maybe more. Instead of developing new classes of antibiotics and other essential drugs, companies are focused solely on “me too” drugs like Viagra and Prilosec.

Unfortunately I don’t know what government’s role in the marketplace should be or how it can react to encourage innovation and help create more affordable prescription drugs. Maybe there is no legislative solution, as there often isn’t, and it is a matter of publicizing the methods of the drug industry.

1 Comments

Bunny said:

You forgot about one very large problem... LAWYERS! I can't turn on the TV without seeing countless ads from every ambulance chasing attorney in Atlanta trying to get people to sue drug companies. If anything occurs, even if it is listed as a possible side effect...the deepest pockets are sued. You want cost of drugs to come down? GET RID OF THE LAW SUITS!!! Why are the drugs cheaper in Canada? Canadians don't sue everyone and everything for zillions of dollars. Of course, my sister has to come to the US to get her medical care because you will die while waiting for surgery, even critical care surgery. She has lived in Canada for 35 years and she has always had to come home for my family to pay out of their pockets for her to get medical care...ah, the wonders of socialized medicine!!

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lars published on October 26, 2004 9:17 AM.

No. 3 was the previous entry in this blog.

Vote is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01